1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Reuso Technologies Inc. currently has 1 pending office action in its patent portfolio. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, showing a concentrated prosecution focus for the company's active filings. The company's current interaction with the patent office is limited to this 1 case.
WALSH, EMMETT K is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending office action under review. This 1 examiner is responsible for the entirety of the company's current pending workload, as the 1 busiest examiner pending count equals the total of 1 pending office action. Practitioners should focus on the specific examination style of WALSH, EMMETT K for this portfolio.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WALSH, EMMETT K | 1 | 52.7% | +20.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19199844 | ELECTRONIC USER INTERFACE FOR TAGGING AND TRACKING REUSABLE PACKAGING USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO MAXIMIZE THE USAGE OF A PHYSICAL PRODUCT ACROSS ITS LIFESPAN | WALSH, EMMETT K | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19199844 | ELECTRONIC USER INTERFACE FOR TAGGING AND TRACKING REUSABLE PACKAGING USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO MAXIMIZE THE USAGE OF A PHYSICAL PRODUCT ACROSS ITS LIFESPAN | WALSH, EMMETT K | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19199844 | ELECTRONIC USER INTERFACE FOR TAGGING AND TRACKING REUSABLE PACKAGING USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO MAXIMIZE THE USAGE OF A PHYSICAL PRODUCT ACROSS ITS LIFESPAN | WALSH, EMMETT K | — | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 06, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial