Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Revolution Biotech LLC is currently navigating the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area with 1 pending office action. This single matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, SARA ELIZABETH TOWNSLEY. The prosecution is localized within 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a specific technical focus for the company's current patent efforts. SARA ELIZABETH TOWNSLEY is the busiest examiner, holding 1 pending office action at this time.
This count of pending office actions represents the total volume of active responses required by the entity. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the administrative burden is minimal. The 1 pending office action assigned to the busiest examiner matches the total pending workload for the entire portfolio. Practitioners can expect a focused interaction with the patent office given these metrics. The concentration in 1 distinct art unit suggests that the current legal strategy is confined to a specific technological niche. This arrangement allows the applicant to tailor their arguments to the specific preferences of a single examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TOWNSLEY, SARA ELIZABETH | 1 | 25.5% | +49.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17915954 | AGRICULTURAL COMPOSITION | TOWNSLEY, SARA ELIZABETH | 147d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17915954 | AGRICULTURAL COMPOSITION | TOWNSLEY, SARA ELIZABETH | 147d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1629 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17915954 | AGRICULTURAL COMPOSITION | TOWNSLEY, SARA ELIZABETH | 1629 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 147d overdue | Pending | Sep 29, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial