Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Rheinmetall Waffe Munition GmbH

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

3 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Rheinmetall Waffe Munition GmbH has 3 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. All 3 actions are located within 1 distinct art unit, showing a high degree of departmental consistency for the company's current applications. These cases are assigned to 3 distinct examiners, meaning each pending action is being reviewed by a different person.

CLEMENT, MICHELLE RENEE is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. Since each of the 3 distinct examiners holds exactly 1 action, the workload is evenly split across the USPTO staff. The busiest examiner pending count of 1 confirms that no single official is handling multiple matters for the company. The single art unit involved simplifies the procedural landscape for these 3 pending office actions, even with several different examiners to consider. Practitioners must manage multiple examiner relationships while adhering to the specific practices of the 1 distinct art unit that governs the workload.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
2
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
§102 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CLEMENT, MICHELLE RENEE 1 69.7% +18.6%
BERGIN, JAMES S 1 79.4% +9.9%
LEE, BENJAMIN P 1 80.1% +16.9%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19173356 PROJECTILE AND WEAPON SYSTEM LEE, BENJAMIN P —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19215823 PROPELLANT CHARGE, PROPELLANT CHARGE ASSEMBLY, AND CARTRIDGE AMMUNITION BERGIN, JAMES S 30d

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19222982 IGNITION SYSTEM, PROPELLANT CHARGE AND PIECE OF AMMUNITION CLEMENT, MICHELLE RENEE —
19173356 PROJECTILE AND WEAPON SYSTEM LEE, BENJAMIN P —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3641 3

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19222982 IGNITION SYSTEM, PROPELLANT CHARGE AND PIECE OF AMMUNITION CLEMENT, MICHELLE RENEE 3641 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending May 29, 2025
19215823 PROPELLANT CHARGE, PROPELLANT CHARGE ASSEMBLY, AND CARTRIDGE AMMUNITION BERGIN, JAMES S 3641 §103§112 Non-Final OA 30d Pending May 22, 2025
19173356 PROJECTILE AND WEAPON SYSTEM LEE, BENJAMIN P 3641 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 08, 2025

Managing Rheinmetall Waffe Munition GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Rheinmetall Waffe Munition GmbH have?

Rheinmetall Waffe Munition GmbH has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Rheinmetall Waffe Munition GmbH applications?

Michelle Renee Clement has the most, with 1 of Rheinmetall Waffe Munition GmbH's pending office actions.

What technology area are Rheinmetall Waffe Munition GmbH's patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month