Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Riverview Ranch Ltd. is currently navigating 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This single pending action represents the current active prosecution for the company. The Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area suggests that the company's intellectual property is focused on mechanical systems or e-commerce platforms.
The prosecution is localized to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The involvement of only 1 distinct art unit indicates that the pending application is classified within a specific technical domain. This concentration simplifies the management of the portfolio, as the company only needs to navigate the specific rules and interpretations of one administrative unit.
BROOK VICTORIA SCHMID is the busiest examiner, with 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This examiner manages the entirety of the pending workload for the portfolio. With only 1 distinct examiner and 1 pending office action, the company can develop a targeted prosecution strategy that addresses the specific requirements and examination style of this individual.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCHMID, BROOK VICTORIA | 1 | 28.0% | +60.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18142029 | INCUBATION TRAY FOR BEES | SCHMID, BROOK VICTORIA | 103d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18142029 | INCUBATION TRAY FOR BEES | SCHMID, BROOK VICTORIA | 103d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3642 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18142029 | INCUBATION TRAY FOR BEES | SCHMID, BROOK VICTORIA | 3642 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 103d overdue | Pending | May 02, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial