Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Rnagene Inc. currently manages a portfolio with 1 pending office action. This 1 action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner. The prosecution activity is concentrated under BUNKER, AMY M, who serves as the busiest examiner for the company. This examiner is responsible for 1 pending office action, which represents the total pending workload for the portfolio.
The data shows 1 distinct examiner and 0 distinct art units. This indicates that while the prosecution is being handled by BUNKER, AMY M, the art unit classification is recorded as 0 in the current data set. With 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner, the company's current patent office interactions are concentrated. This structure suggests that the company is not currently navigating office actions across different examiners.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BUNKER, AMY M | 1 | 29.1% | +45.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18564896 | METHOD FOR SCREENING EXTERNALLY-INTRODUCED MRNA CAPABLE OF EXISTING FOR LONG TIME IN CELL | BUNKER, AMY M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18564896 | METHOD FOR SCREENING EXTERNALLY-INTRODUCED MRNA CAPABLE OF EXISTING FOR LONG TIME IN CELL | BUNKER, AMY M | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18564896 | METHOD FOR SCREENING EXTERNALLY-INTRODUCED MRNA CAPABLE OF EXISTING FOR LONG TIME IN CELL | BUNKER, AMY M | — | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 28, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial