Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Roberta Mazzanti currently has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This portfolio involves a single distinct examiner and a sole distinct art unit. The busiest examiner is PREMRAJ, CATHERINE C, who is responsible for 1 pending office action.
The prosecution for Roberta Mazzanti is limited to active matters in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering area. With a single distinct examiner, PREMRAJ, CATHERINE C, the applicant faces a singular review process. The involvement of a sole distinct art unit means that the prosecution is not spread across different examination environments, focusing all current efforts on one specific examiner and unit. Practitioners should note that the prosecution strategy cannot be diversified at this stage, as there is only a single active matter. The single pending office action represents the entirety of the current legal challenge for this portfolio, making the specific examiner's perspective the most critical factor for the applicant's success.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PREMRAJ, CATHERINE C | 1 | 56.5% | +48.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17287658 | SAFETY ASSEMBLY FOR PERFORMING ENDODERMAL RADIOFREQUENC Y TREATMENTS | PREMRAJ, CATHERINE C | 105d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3794 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17287658 | SAFETY ASSEMBLY FOR PERFORMING ENDODERMAL RADIOFREQUENC Y TREATMENTS | PREMRAJ, CATHERINE C | 3794 | §103 | Final Rejection | 105d overdue | Pending | Apr 22, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial