Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Robotic Technology Administration LLC operates within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The portfolio currently contains 1 pending office action. This prosecution activity is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, WALSH, EMMETT K, who serves as the busiest examiner for the company.
The work is situated within 1 distinct art unit, suggesting a specific technical focus for the company's current filings. WALSH, EMMETT K is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. For patent practitioners, this data shows that the company's current interaction with the patent office is limited to a single point of contact. Because there is only 1 pending office action, the prosecution strategy is entirely dependent on the dialogue with this 1 examiner within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field. The presence of 1 distinct art unit further confirms that the current intellectual property being pursued is categorized within a narrow technical classification.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WALSH, EMMETT K | 1 | 52.7% | +20.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18496622 | Information System for a Robotic Parking Garage | WALSH, EMMETT K | 12d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18496622 | Information System for a Robotic Parking Garage | WALSH, EMMETT K | 12d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3628 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18496622 | Information System for a Robotic Parking Garage | WALSH, EMMETT K | 3628 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 12d | Pending | Oct 27, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial