Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Robovine LLC has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, CALLAWAY, SPENCER THOMAS, who is the busiest examiner with 1 pending action. The activity is confined to 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a very narrow and focused prosecution profile, with 1 examiner and 1 art unit managing the entirety of the company's 1 pending office action. This 1 to 1 to 1 relationship between the action, the examiner, and the art unit reflects a singular point of focus for the company's current patent strategy.
Practitioners should note that the outcome of this 1 pending office action will be determined solely by the standards of CALLAWAY, SPENCER THOMAS and the specific practices of the 1 assigned art unit. There are no other pending actions in the portfolio to serve as a baseline for comparison. The concentration in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area suggests a specific technical application that is currently the sole focus of the company's prosecution efforts. Success in this matter is essential, as it is the only active engagement with the patent office at this time. Tailoring the response to the known preferences of this 1 examiner is the most critical task for the prosecution team.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CALLAWAY, SPENCER THOMAS | 1 | 36.7% | +16.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19308911 | Adjustable Teat Treatment Apparatus and Method | CALLAWAY, SPENCER THOMAS | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19308911 | Adjustable Teat Treatment Apparatus and Method | CALLAWAY, SPENCER THOMAS | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3642 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19308911 | Adjustable Teat Treatment Apparatus and Method | CALLAWAY, SPENCER THOMAS | 3642 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 25, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial