Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Rockett John Wallace currently manages 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, ALI, SABA N., who is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. The prosecution is localized within 1 distinct art unit, showing a concentrated effort in this specific field. This arrangement suggests that the company is focusing its current intellectual property strategy on a single, specific innovation within the medical devices sector.
The busiest_examiner_pending count of 1 for ALI, SABA N. matches the total pending office actions for the company. This indicates that Rockett John Wallace is currently focused on a single patent application within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector. The prosecution profile is highly streamlined, with all current activity managed by one examiner in one art unit. For the practitioner, this means the outcome of the company's current patent efforts depends entirely on the perspective and requirements of this specific examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALI, SABA N. | 1 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18389474 | GAME BOARD HOLDER AND METHOD OF USE | ALI, SABA N. | 5d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3711 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18389474 | GAME BOARD HOLDER AND METHOD OF USE | ALI, SABA N. | 3711 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 5d overdue | Pending | Nov 14, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial