Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Rodradar Ltd. is currently navigating the patent prosecution process with 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This application is handled by 1 distinct examiner, indicating a highly concentrated workload for the company. The presence of 1 distinct art unit shows that the technical evaluation is confined to a single specialized group at the USPTO. This structure simplifies the prosecution landscape by focusing all current activity on a single point of contact and a specific set of technical standards. The presence of 1 pending office action indicates a very specific focus for the company's current intellectual property efforts.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is BARKER, MATTHEW M, who is handling 1 pending office action. Since the busiest examiner pending count is 1, this individual is responsible for the entirety of the company's active matters. The fact that there is 1 pending office action across 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit means the entire prosecution workload is consolidated. Practitioners should prioritize the specific requirements of this 1 pending action to ensure the successful advancement of the company's patent portfolio within the identified art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BARKER, MATTHEW M | 1 | 72.6% | +14.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18438630 | RADAR SYSTEM FOR DETECTING PROFILES OF OBJECTS, PARTICULARLY IN A VICINITY OF A MACHINE WORK TOOL | BARKER, MATTHEW M | 5d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3646 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18438630 | RADAR SYSTEM FOR DETECTING PROFILES OF OBJECTS, PARTICULARLY IN A VICINITY OF A MACHINE WORK TOOL | BARKER, MATTHEW M | 3646 | §103 | Final Rejection | 5d overdue | Pending | Feb 12, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial