Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Rollvy Inc. currently has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, HAYES, KRISTEN C, and 1 distinct art unit. HAYES, KRISTEN C is the busiest examiner with 1 pending action, representing the company's total active prosecution. This single mechanical systems case is the only matter currently pending at the office, which allows the company to focus its resources on a single set of technical claims.
Because the company is managing only 1 pending office action, it can focus its resources on the specific technical challenges presented by the 1 distinct art unit. The outcome of this mechanical systems matter depends entirely on the interpretation of HAYES, KRISTEN C, who is the 1 distinct examiner assigned to the case. Practitioners should prioritize a thorough review of this examiner's previous actions to ensure that the response to the 1 pending office action is tailored to her specific procedural and technical preferences. This focused approach can lead to a more efficient path toward allowance for the company's mechanical innovations.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAYES, KRISTEN C | 1 | 68.4% | +21.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18103467 | SELF-PROPELLING BODY LIMB MASSAGING DEVICE | HAYES, KRISTEN C | 6d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18103467 | SELF-PROPELLING BODY LIMB MASSAGING DEVICE | HAYES, KRISTEN C | 6d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3642 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18103467 | SELF-PROPELLING BODY LIMB MASSAGING DEVICE | HAYES, KRISTEN C | 3642 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 6d | Pending | Jan 30, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialRollvy Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Kristen C Hayes has the most, with 1 of Rollvy Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
