Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Networking & Security • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Rosco Inc. has 3 pending office actions in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These 3 actions are handled by 3 distinct examiners across 2 distinct art units. This indicates that each pending matter is assigned to a different individual examiner, resulting in a complete dispersion of the workload among the assigned officials. The concentration in 2 distinct art units for the 3 pending actions suggests that the company's semiconductor and optics filings are focused within a narrow set of examination groups.
The busiest examiner is GYLLSTROM, BRYON T, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. This matches the workload of the other distinct examiners involved. With the 2 distinct art units for the 3 pending actions, there may be some consistency in the standards applied by the administrative groups. For practitioners, this means that while there is no examiner-level concentration, there may be some consistency in the technical requirements. The busiest examiner is responsible for 1 pending office action.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (33%) |
| §102 only | 1 (33%) |
| Double-patenting only | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GYLLSTROM, BRYON T | 1 | 67.8% | +7.5% |
| GIRMA, FEKADESELASS | 1 | 77.0% | +17.8% |
| CZEKAJ, DAVID J | 1 | 49.8% | -7.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19309434 | ADVANCED PEDESTRIAN AND/OR DRIVER ALERT AND/OR COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEM | GIRMA, FEKADESELASS | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2875 | 1 |
| 2487 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19341553 | DOWNLIGHTING SIGNAL AND ILLUMINATION MIRROR HEAD FOR VEHICLE | GYLLSTROM, BRYON T | 2875 | §102Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 26, 2025 |
| 19309434 | ADVANCED PEDESTRIAN AND/OR DRIVER ALERT AND/OR COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEM | GIRMA, FEKADESELASS | — | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 25, 2025 |
| 18459914 | MIRROR MONITOR USING TWO LEVELS OF REFLECTIVITY AND TRANSMISSIBILITY | CZEKAJ, DAVID J | 2487 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 5d overdue | Pending | Sep 01, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial