Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Rove Concepts Pty Ltd. currently manages 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is handled by 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. SHARMA, NABIN KUMAR is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending office action. This indicates a singular focus for the company's current patent prosecution.
The presence of 1 distinct art unit shows that the pending work is concentrated in this technical area. For the applicant, this means that prosecution strategy is presently tied to the specific requirements of this single examiner. The limited scope of 1 pending office action suggests a highly targeted intellectual property effort at this time.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHARMA, NABIN KUMAR | 1 | 54.7% | +56.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18562017 | WHEELCHAIR CUSTOMIZATION SYSTEM, METHODS AND COMPONENTS | SHARMA, NABIN KUMAR | 16d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18562017 | WHEELCHAIR CUSTOMIZATION SYSTEM, METHODS AND COMPONENTS | SHARMA, NABIN KUMAR | 16d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3612 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18562017 | WHEELCHAIR CUSTOMIZATION SYSTEM, METHODS AND COMPONENTS | SHARMA, NABIN KUMAR | 3612 | §102§112 | Non-Final OA | 16d | Pending | Nov 17, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial