Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Rs Flexscreen LLC

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

3 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Rs Flexscreen LLC manages a patent portfolio in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area with 2 pending office actions. Both of these actions are assigned to 1 distinct examiner and are located within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates an extremely concentrated prosecution strategy where all active matters are being handled by the same individual. The involvement of only 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's current filings are focused on a very specific technical niche.

MASSAD, ABE L is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently overseeing 2 pending office actions. Since the total number of pending office actions is also 2, this single examiner is responsible for the company's entire active workload at the USPTO. This concentration allows for a consistent examination experience across the 2 pending office actions but also centralizes the risk associated with a single examiner's decisions. Practitioners should focus on the specific preferences of MASSAD, ABE L to move these cases forward.

The data reflects a prosecution profile that is not diversified across multiple examiners or art units. With 2 pending office actions being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, the company has a singular point of contact for its current intellectual property efforts. This arrangement simplifies the administrative burden of tracking 2 pending office actions but means that the company's success in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector is currently tied to the feedback from 1 distinct art unit.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
2
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (67%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MASSAD, ABE L 2 56.7% +65.7%
SHEPHERD, MATTHEW RICHARD 1 54.5% +39.7%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17617228 Improved Methods of Manufacturing Flexible Screen Frames SHEPHERD, MATTHEW RICHARD —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18275260 CAMBERED WINDOW AND DOOR SCREENS MASSAD, ABE L 8d overdue
17516683 Screen Installation Improvements MASSAD, ABE L 2d overdue
17617228 Improved Methods of Manufacturing Flexible Screen Frames SHEPHERD, MATTHEW RICHARD —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3634 3

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18275260 CAMBERED WINDOW AND DOOR SCREENS MASSAD, ABE L 3634 §103 Final Rejection 8d overdue Pending Aug 01, 2023
17617228 Improved Methods of Manufacturing Flexible Screen Frames SHEPHERD, MATTHEW RICHARD 3634 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 07, 2021
17516683 Screen Installation Improvements MASSAD, ABE L 3634 §103 Non-Final OA 2d overdue Pending Nov 01, 2021

Managing Rs Flexscreen LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Rs Flexscreen LLC have?

Rs Flexscreen LLC has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Rs Flexscreen LLC applications?

Abe L Massad has the most, with 2 of Rs Flexscreen LLC's pending office actions.

What technology area are Rs Flexscreen LLC's patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month