Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Rtg Scientific LLC

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Rtg Scientific LLC has 3 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These 3 actions are distributed among 3 distinct examiners, ensuring that each pending matter is being reviewed by a different individual. The portfolio is active in 2 distinct art units, which indicates that at least two of the examiners are likely working within the same technical department. This structure provides the company with multiple perspectives on their medical device applications.

SIPP, AMY R. is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 pending office action. Because the total pending count is 3, the workload is split among the 3 distinct examiners. This distribution across 2 art units allows the company to receive feedback from different reviewers while focusing on a specific range of mechanical engineering technologies. Practitioners should monitor the interactions within the shared art unit to identify any consistent departmental trends that might affect the pending cases.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
2
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (67%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SIPP, AMY R. 1 71.1% +26.0%
MATTHEWS, TESSA M 1 82.9% +24.0%
MERENE, JAN CHRISTOP L 1 68.5% +48.1%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19199622 BONE FIXATION DEVICES, SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND INSTRUMENTS MATTHEWS, TESSA M 15d

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17555391 FASTENING DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS MERENE, JAN CHRISTOP L 8d overdue
19199622 BONE FIXATION DEVICES, SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND INSTRUMENTS MATTHEWS, TESSA M 15d
19252910 SOFT TISSUE RECONSTRUCTION DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS SIPP, AMY R. —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3773 2
3775 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19252910 SOFT TISSUE RECONSTRUCTION DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS SIPP, AMY R. 3775 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 27, 2025
19199622 BONE FIXATION DEVICES, SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND INSTRUMENTS MATTHEWS, TESSA M 3773 §103§112 Final Rejection 15d Pending May 06, 2025
17555391 FASTENING DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS MERENE, JAN CHRISTOP L 3773 §103 Non-Final OA 8d overdue Pending Dec 18, 2021

Managing Rtg Scientific LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Rtg Scientific LLC have?

Rtg Scientific LLC has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Rtg Scientific LLC applications?

Amy R. Sipp has the most, with 1 of Rtg Scientific LLC's pending office actions.

What technology area are Rtg Scientific LLC's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month