Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Rts R&D Inc. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This single active matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The data shows that the company's current prosecution efforts are concentrated in this specific technical field, with no other active matters currently reported.
EWALD, MARIA VERONICA is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, responsible for 1 pending office action. The presence of 1 distinct art unit indicates that the prosecution is localized within a single specialized division of the patent office. This individual handles the 1 pending office action for the company at the office.
For a practitioner, this concentration means that the prosecution strategy is focused on the 1 distinct examiner. There are no other active cases or different art units to coordinate, allowing for a direct approach. The company's immediate goals in Chemistry & Materials are tied to the outcome of this single matter, making the interaction with the assigned examiner a primary focus for the portfolio.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| EWALD, MARIA VERONICA | 1 | 58.4% | +6.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18349583 | METHOD FOR MATCHING SURFACE TEXTURE AND COLOR OF CONCRETE ROOFING TILES | EWALD, MARIA VERONICA | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1783 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18349583 | METHOD FOR MATCHING SURFACE TEXTURE AND COLOR OF CONCRETE ROOFING TILES | EWALD, MARIA VERONICA | 1783 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jul 10, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial