Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Networking & Security
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Rumble Inc. is active in the Networking & Security technology area with 1 pending office action. This 1 matter is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, MARANDI, JAMES R. As the only examiner with an active case for the company, MARANDI, JAMES R is designated as the busiest examiner for the portfolio. This concentration means that the company's immediate patent outcomes are dependent on the evaluation of 1 individual.
The prosecution is confined to 1 distinct art unit. With 1 busiest examiner pending action, the company's entire active workload is concentrated under 1 individual's oversight. This streamlined profile indicates that the company's immediate patent outcomes are dependent on the evaluation of 1 distinct examiner within 1 distinct art unit. For the applicant, this simplifies the management of the current portfolio but focuses all prosecution risk on 1 point of contact. The presence of 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner reflects a centralized prosecution environment.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MARANDI, JAMES R | 1 | 60.4% | +27.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18981048 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ONLINE AND INTERACTIVE CONTENT CREATION AND ADVERTISING PLACEMENT AND MONETIZATION | MARANDI, JAMES R | 57d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18981048 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ONLINE AND INTERACTIVE CONTENT CREATION AND ADVERTISING PLACEMENT AND MONETIZATION | MARANDI, JAMES R | 57d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2421 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18981048 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ONLINE AND INTERACTIVE CONTENT CREATION AND ADVERTISING PLACEMENT AND MONETIZATION | MARANDI, JAMES R | 2421 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 57d | Pending | Dec 13, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial