Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Runbuggy Omi Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is being processed in 1 distinct art unit. The portfolio involves 1 distinct examiner, reflecting a narrow scope of current patent office engagement. The 1 distinct art unit involved provides a singular administrative environment for the company's active prosecution.
VETTER, DANIEL is the busiest examiner for the company, overseeing 1 pending office action. This 1 pending action represents the total active workload for the portfolio. Because only 1 distinct examiner and 1 art unit are involved, the company can focus its resources on the specific procedural expectations of this single official. VETTER, DANIEL is the sole individual reviewing the company's current filings.
Practitioners should analyze the historical trends of VETTER, DANIEL within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area. The 1 pending office action is the only matter requiring immediate attention. This concentration within 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit allows for a highly targeted legal strategy to advance the company's intellectual property goals.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| VETTER, DANIEL | 1 | 20.1% | +9.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18643428 | ELECTRONIC TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD | VETTER, DANIEL | 20d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3628 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18643428 | ELECTRONIC TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD | VETTER, DANIEL | 3628 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 20d | Pending | Apr 23, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial