Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Sacmi Imola S C

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Sacmi Imola S C currently manages 1 pending office action. This activity is focused in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. With 1 pending office action, the company's current patent prosecution efforts are concentrated on a specific matter rather than a broad array of simultaneous filings.

The examination is conducted by 1 distinct examiner who operates within 1 distinct art unit. HAUTH, GALEN H is the busiest examiner for this portfolio and is responsible for 1 pending office action. This 1 to 1 relationship between the examiner and the pending action centralizes the technical review within the Chemistry & Materials sector.

The reliance on 1 distinct examiner within 1 distinct art unit means that the prosecution strategy is highly dependent on the specific interpretations of HAUTH, GALEN H. For a company in the Chemistry & Materials field, this 1 pending office action requires a focused response to the specific requirements of the assigned official. The lack of multiple distinct examiners simplifies the administrative tracking of the portfolio but increases the impact of the decisions made by HAUTH, GALEN H.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HAUTH, GALEN H 1 64.8% +18.0%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17797554 DEVICE FOR THE COOLING AND EXTRACTION OF PREFORMS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF PLASTIC CONTAINERS HAUTH, GALEN H —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1743 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
17797554 DEVICE FOR THE COOLING AND EXTRACTION OF PREFORMS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF PLASTIC CONTAINERS HAUTH, GALEN H 1743 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 04, 2022

Managing Sacmi Imola S C's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month