Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Saf-holland GmbH

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 14 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Saf-holland GmbH holds a patent portfolio in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The data indicates there is 1 pending office action currently active. This action represents the total volume of active prosecution for the company's mechanical technologies. For a practitioner, this indicates a focused stage of engagement where a single application is the primary focus of legal efforts at the USPTO.

The examination process involves a distinct examiner and a single art unit. This concentration points to a specific technical focus for the company's filings within the USPTO's mechanical engineering divisions. NGUYEN, STEVEN VU is the busiest examiner assigned to the portfolio. The use of a single art unit allows for a consistent application of examination standards and technical review to the company's mechanical innovations.

NGUYEN, STEVEN VU is handling 1 busiest examiner pending office action. As the total number of pending office actions is 1, NGUYEN, STEVEN VU manages the entire active workload. Practitioners should focus on the specific examination style of NGUYEN, STEVEN VU and the standards of the art unit to advance the company's patenting goals and optimize the prosecution outcome.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
NGUYEN, STEVEN VU 1 77.8% +6.7%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18006034 WHEEL HEAD MONITORING UNIT AND METHOD FOR DETECTING A MALFUNCTION OF A WHEEL HEAD NGUYEN, STEVEN VU —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3668 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18006034 WHEEL HEAD MONITORING UNIT AND METHOD FOR DETECTING A MALFUNCTION OF A WHEEL HEAD NGUYEN, STEVEN VU 3668 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 19, 2023

Managing Saf-holland GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month