Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Networking & Security
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 13 patents granted in the last 365 days
Sands Lab Inc. currently has 2 pending office actions in the Networking & Security technology area. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct art units and involve 2 distinct examiners. This distribution indicates that the company's networking technologies are being evaluated from multiple technical perspectives. This lack of examiner concentration means that the company must adapt its arguments to suit different individual styles even within the same broad technology area.
Rupal Dharia is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently handling 1 pending office action. The presence of 2 distinct examiners and 2 art units for only 2 pending actions shows a lack of concentration in the prosecution. Each application is being handled by a different examiner in a different unit, requiring a tailored approach for each case. Practitioners should note that having 2 distinct art units for only 2 pending actions implies that each application is being scrutinized under different technical standards, requiring a high degree of versatility in prosecution strategy.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DHARIA, RUPAL | 1 | 76.0% | -8.5% |
| DILUZIO, NICHOLAS JOSEPH | 1 | 31.3% | +83.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18138429 | CYBER THREAT INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, CYBER THREAT INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING CYBER THREAT INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAM | DILUZIO, NICHOLAS JOSEPH | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18138429 | CYBER THREAT INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, CYBER THREAT INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING CYBER THREAT INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAM | DILUZIO, NICHOLAS JOSEPH | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2400 | 1 |
| 2498 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18235779 | CYBER THREAT INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, CYBER THREAT INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING CYBER THREAT INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAM | DHARIA, RUPAL | 2400 | §102Other | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Aug 18, 2023 |
| 18138429 | CYBER THREAT INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, CYBER THREAT INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING CYBER THREAT INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAM | DILUZIO, NICHOLAS JOSEPH | 2498 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 24, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial