Technology area: Networking & Security
6 pending office actions • 5 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days
Sandvine Corporation currently has 6 pending office actions in the Networking & Security technology area. These matters are spread across 5 distinct art units, indicating a diverse technical focus within the networking field. The portfolio is handled by 6 distinct examiners, which means that every one of the 6 pending office actions is being reviewed by a different person.
The busiest examiner, BOUTAH, ALINA A, is responsible for 1 pending office action. This reflects an even distribution of the workload, as each of the 6 distinct examiners is assigned exactly one action. Because the 6 pending office actions are distributed across 5 distinct art units, the company must navigate multiple administrative environments. This structure requires the company to tailor its prosecution strategies to the specific preferences of 6 distinct examiners, as no single examiner or art unit dominates the current Networking & Security docket.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (17%) |
| §103 only | 3 (50%) |
| Double-patenting only | 1 (17%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (17%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BOUTAH, ALINA A | 1 | 89.8% | +9.4% |
| MEJIA, ANTHONY | 1 | 83.8% | +17.9% |
| REYES, CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY | 1 | 81.5% | +15.4% |
| NEURAUTER JR, GEORGE C | 1 | 76.6% | +10.6% |
| MAHMUD, GOLAM | 1 | 61.5% | +30.1% |
| ZHANG, ZHENSHENG | 1 | 76.3% | +11.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18389918 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRAFFIC FLOW CONTENT CLASSIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION CONFIDENCE LEVEL | REYES, CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY | 71d overdue |
| 18944793 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CLASSIFYING AND HANDLING VOICE OVER IP TRAFFIC | MEJIA, ANTHONY | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18390988 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRAFFIC FLOW CLASSIFICATION | NEURAUTER JR, GEORGE C | 31d overdue |
| 19219004 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING DISTRIBUTED SHAPING IN A COMPUTER NETWORK | BOUTAH, ALINA A | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18389918 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRAFFIC FLOW CONTENT CLASSIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION CONFIDENCE LEVEL | REYES, CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY | 71d overdue |
| 18390988 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRAFFIC FLOW CLASSIFICATION | NEURAUTER JR, GEORGE C | 31d overdue |
| 18303953 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CLASSIFYING OBFUSCATED TRAFFIC FLOWS | ZHANG, ZHENSHENG | 19d overdue |
| 18944793 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CLASSIFYING AND HANDLING VOICE OVER IP TRAFFIC | MEJIA, ANTHONY | — |
| 18470793 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING NETWORK TRAFFIC IN A DISTRIBUTED ENVIRONMENT | MAHMUD, GOLAM | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2458 | 2 |
| 2455 | 1 |
| 2475 | 1 |
| 2459 | 1 |
| 2474 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19219004 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING DISTRIBUTED SHAPING IN A COMPUTER NETWORK | BOUTAH, ALINA A | 2458 | §101§103§112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 27, 2025 |
| 18944793 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CLASSIFYING AND HANDLING VOICE OVER IP TRAFFIC | MEJIA, ANTHONY | 2455 | DP | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Nov 12, 2024 |
| 18389918 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRAFFIC FLOW CONTENT CLASSIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION CONFIDENCE LEVEL | REYES, CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY | 2475 | §103 | Final Rejection | 71d overdue | Pending | Dec 20, 2023 |
| 18390988 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRAFFIC FLOW CLASSIFICATION | NEURAUTER JR, GEORGE C | 2459 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 31d overdue | Pending | Dec 20, 2023 |
| 18470793 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING NETWORK TRAFFIC IN A DISTRIBUTED ENVIRONMENT | MAHMUD, GOLAM | 2458 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 20, 2023 |
| 18303953 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CLASSIFYING OBFUSCATED TRAFFIC FLOWS | ZHANG, ZHENSHENG | 2474 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 19d overdue | Pending | Apr 20, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialSandvine Corporation has 6 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 5 art units and 6 examiners.
Alina A Boutah has the most, with 1 of Sandvine Corporation's pending office actions.
Mostly Networking & Security (USPTO Tech Center 2400), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
