Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Sanko Tekstil Isletmeleri San Ve Tic A S

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Sanko Tekstil Isletmeleri San Ve Tic A S currently has 2 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. Each of these 2 actions is assigned to a different distinct examiner and is located in a different distinct art unit. This one to one ratio between actions, examiners, and art units shows a completely distributed prosecution load.

Heather N. Mangine is listed as the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. With only 2 total actions pending, the portfolio is small and lacks any concentration within specific art units or under specific examiners. Practitioners managing these files face a unique set of circumstances for every active application. The involvement of 2 distinct art units for only 2 actions suggests that the company is pursuing protection for distinct technical innovations that do not fall under a single examination group.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
2
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (50%)
Double-patenting + other1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MANGINE, HEATHER N 1 47.4% +65.1%
MCKINNON, LASHAWNDA T 1 53.9% +30.2%

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19385405 COMPRESSION GARMENT WITH MULTIPLE COMPRESSION FORCES AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME MANGINE, HEATHER N —
18769522 COMPOSITE YARN COMPRISING AT LEAST TWO SINGLE ELASTIC FILAMENTS AND A PLURALITY OF INELASTIC ELEMENTS MCKINNON, LASHAWNDA T —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3732 1
1789 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19385405 COMPRESSION GARMENT WITH MULTIPLE COMPRESSION FORCES AND METHOD FOR FORMING THE SAME MANGINE, HEATHER N 3732 §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 11, 2025
18769522 COMPOSITE YARN COMPRISING AT LEAST TWO SINGLE ELASTIC FILAMENTS AND A PLURALITY OF INELASTIC ELEMENTS MCKINNON, LASHAWNDA T 1789 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 11, 2024

Managing Sanko Tekstil Isletmeleri San Ve Tic A S's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month