Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Sape Holdings LLC

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Sape Holdings LLC focuses its patent prosecution within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company currently has 1 pending office action, which represents the entire scope of its present interaction with the patent office. This case is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, indicating a highly concentrated and singular prosecution focus.

The technical evaluation of the portfolio is limited to a distinct art unit. CAUDLE, LOGAN WILLIAM is the busiest examiner for the company and is responsible for the busiest examiner pending office action. Because the total number of pending cases matches the busiest examiner's workload, this individual is the only examiner currently reviewing the company's applications. This concentration means that the company's immediate patent outcomes are entirely dependent on the standards of this examiner and the associated art unit.

For a practitioner, this profile indicates a low-complexity environment. There is no need to coordinate between different examiner styles or manage the varying requirements of multiple art units. The strategy should be specifically tailored to the pending office action and the preferences of CAUDLE, LOGAN WILLIAM. The distinct examiner and art unit involved simplify the management of the company's intellectual property at this stage.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CAUDLE, LOGAN WILLIAM 1 — —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3641 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19446274 TRIGGER ASSEMBLY WITH PULL AND RELEASE DISCHARGE FEATURE AND RELATED METHODS CAUDLE, LOGAN WILLIAM 3641 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 12, 2026

Managing Sape Holdings LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month