Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Savior Brain Inc. currently has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and a single art unit. Elizabeth Evans Mulvaney is the busiest examiner with the only pending office action. The company's prosecution profile is focused on this single pending matter, which constitutes the entirety of its current active portfolio at the patent office.
All immediate patent office interaction is handled by Elizabeth Evans Mulvaney, meaning her specific examination style and the standards of her art unit are the primary factors for the company's current applications. This concentration of effort allows the company to focus its resources on a single set of examiner requirements. Practitioners should prioritize understanding the specific preferences of Elizabeth Evans Mulvaney to effectively advance the company's goals within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MULVANEY, ELIZABETH EVANS | 1 | 78.9% | +15.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18975665 | Lightweight Integration Of Shock Absorbing Technology In A Protective Device | MULVANEY, ELIZABETH EVANS | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3732 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18975665 | Lightweight Integration Of Shock Absorbing Technology In A Protective Device | MULVANEY, ELIZABETH EVANS | 3732 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 10, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial