Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Schweerbau International GmbH & Co. Kg

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Schweerbau International GmbH & Co. Kg has 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct art units, indicating that the company's mechanical systems are being reviewed in different specialized groups. The involvement of distinct examiners means that each case is being handled by a different person, allowing for independent review of the technical merits of each application.

KUHFUSS, ZACHARY L is the busiest examiner for the applicant, with 1 pending office action. Since there are 2 pending office actions and distinct examiners, the workload is distributed such that the busiest examiner has a portion of the cases. This spread across 2 distinct art units and examiners requires the company to manage separate prosecution tracks simultaneously. The lack of concentration with a single examiner or art unit provides a level of diversification for the portfolio.

For a practitioner, the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems focus requires adapting to the specific requirements of the different art units. The 1 pending office action under the busiest examiner represents half of the active workload, making its outcome significant. The applicant must address the unique technical challenges and examiner styles present in each case. Coordinating these efforts is necessary to ensure that the company's broader mechanical systems strategy remains consistent across the distinct examiners involved.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KUHFUSS, ZACHARY L 1 77.9% +18.2%
RAMOS, NICOLE N 1 81.5% +9.9%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18258088 DEVICE FOR MILLING A PROFILE, ASSOCIATED METHOD AND REFERENCE BODY RAMOS, NICOLE N —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18257966 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR GRINDING A PROFILE KUHFUSS, ZACHARY L 2d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3615 1
3722 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18257966 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR GRINDING A PROFILE KUHFUSS, ZACHARY L 3615 §103 Final Rejection 2d overdue Pending Jun 16, 2023
18258088 DEVICE FOR MILLING A PROFILE, ASSOCIATED METHOD AND REFERENCE BODY RAMOS, NICOLE N 3722 §102§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 16, 2023

Managing Schweerbau International GmbH & Co. Kg's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Schweerbau International GmbH & Co. Kg have?

Schweerbau International GmbH & Co. Kg has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Schweerbau International GmbH & Co. Kg applications?

Zachary L Kuhfuss has the most, with 1 of Schweerbau International GmbH & Co. Kg's pending office actions.

What technology area are Schweerbau International GmbH & Co. Kg's patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month