Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Schweitzer-Mauduit International Inc.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Schweitzer-Mauduit International Inc. has 4 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These matters are handled by 3 distinct examiners, indicating some level of consolidation in the prosecution process. The portfolio is active across 2 distinct art units, which suggests that the technical subject matter is concentrated within a few specialized groups at the USPTO. This structure allows for a more focused legal strategy compared to portfolios spread across many different departments. The 4 pending office actions are thus contained within a relatively narrow technical and administrative scope.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is KRINKER, YANA B, who is currently overseeing 2 pending office actions. This concentration is notable because the busiest examiner pending count of 2 represents a significant portion of the 4 total pending office actions. With 3 distinct examiners in total, the remaining workload is split among others, but the influence of the busiest examiner is prominent. Practitioners should note that the outcomes in the 2 distinct art units will be heavily influenced by the specific examination styles of these 3 distinct examiners. The 2 pending office actions assigned to the busiest examiner require particular attention.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (25%)
3
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (75%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KRINKER, YANA B 2 58.5% +31.6%
WORRELL, KEVIN 1 12.5% -3.1%
PHAM, VU PHI 1 46.2% +17.1%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17791273 Flexible Soft Wipe Comprising Individualized Bast Fibers WORRELL, KEVIN 70d

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17741987 Vaping Article Comprising a Functionalized Cooling Zone PHAM, VU PHI 96d overdue
18439124 Filler Containing Blends of Aerosol Generating Materials KRINKER, YANA B 7d
16753278 Reconstituted Plant Sheet For Devices That Heat Tobacco Without Burning It KRINKER, YANA B —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1755 3
1789 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18439124 Filler Containing Blends of Aerosol Generating Materials KRINKER, YANA B 1755 §103 Final Rejection 7d Pending Feb 12, 2024
17791273 Flexible Soft Wipe Comprising Individualized Bast Fibers WORRELL, KEVIN 1789 §103§112 Final Rejection 70d Pending Jul 07, 2022
17741987 Vaping Article Comprising a Functionalized Cooling Zone PHAM, VU PHI 1755 §103 Final Rejection 96d overdue Pending May 11, 2022
16753278 Reconstituted Plant Sheet For Devices That Heat Tobacco Without Burning It KRINKER, YANA B 1755 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 02, 2020

Managing Schweitzer-Mauduit International Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month