Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026

Scientific Games International Inc.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Scientific Games International Inc. operates within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The portfolio currently includes 1 pending office action. This prosecution activity is handled by 1 distinct examiner and is situated within 1 distinct art unit. Such a structure indicates that the company's current legal efforts are highly concentrated in a single technical niche at the USPTO.

GLENN, CHRISTOPHER A. is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, managing 1 pending office action. For a practitioner, this means that the entirety of the company's current prosecution experience is filtered through this individual. There is no diversity of examiner perspective, which makes the specific tendencies and history of GLENN, CHRISTOPHER A. the primary factor in determining the outcome of the pending matter.

The presence of 1 pending office action within 1 distinct art unit suggests a very specific or early-stage filing strategy. Because the company is not currently interacting with multiple examiners, it lacks the broader data points that could inform a more varied prosecution approach. The success of the portfolio in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector is currently dependent on the single path established by the current examiner.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GLENN, CHRISTOPHER A. 1 40.2% +36.7%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17464004 System and Method for Composing Personalized Scratch-Off Lottery Tickets GLENN, CHRISTOPHER A. —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3711 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
17464004 System and Method for Composing Personalized Scratch-Off Lottery Tickets GLENN, CHRISTOPHER A. 3711 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 01, 2021

Managing Scientific Games International Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month