Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Sck Cen manages 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, COOPERRIDER, KELLY MARIE, who holds 1 pending office action as the busiest examiner. Prosecution is currently active in 1 distinct art unit. This indicates that the company's current patent efforts are concentrated under the review of COOPERRIDER, KELLY MARIE, requiring a focused strategy for this single pending matter.
The presence of 1 distinct examiner for the 1 pending office action means that the applicant's success in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area is currently tied to a single individual's interpretation. Because the workload is restricted to 1 distinct art unit, the procedural rules and timelines will be uniform. COOPERRIDER, KELLY MARIE is the sole official responsible for the current pending workload.
For a practitioner, the lack of examiner diversity in this portfolio simplifies relationship management but increases the risk associated with a single examiner's perspective. The 1 pending office action must be navigated within the specific constraints of the 1 distinct art unit. All current prosecution outcomes for Sck Cen depend on the decisions made by COOPERRIDER, KELLY MARIE.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| COOPERRIDER, KELLY MARIE | 1 | — | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18691567 | LIQUID TARGET SYSTEM | COOPERRIDER, KELLY MARIE | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3646 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18691567 | LIQUID TARGET SYSTEM | COOPERRIDER, KELLY MARIE | 3646 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 13, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial