Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Scout Exchange LLC

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Scout Exchange LLC has 4 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 4 actions are handled by 3 distinct examiners across 3 distinct art units. This indicates a small amount of examiner overlap within the portfolio, as 3 examiners are managing 4 actions. The 3 distinct art units suggest that the company's applications fall into several different technical categories, requiring attention to 3 different USPTO sections.

WEBB III, JAMES L is the busiest examiner, managing 2 pending office actions. This means WEBB III, JAMES L is responsible for 2 of the 4 pending office actions. With only 3 distinct examiners involved in total, the company's prosecution is relatively concentrated compared to other portfolios. Practitioners should focus their strategy on WEBB III, JAMES L, who manages 2 of the 4 pending office actions, while also accounting for the specific standards of the 3 distinct art units currently reviewing the company's applications.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (75%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (25%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other3 (75%)
Double-patenting only1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WEBB III, JAMES L 2 13.9% +21.9%
LAKHANI, ANDREW C 1 23.4% +29.1%
OBAID, FATEH M 1 68.0% +35.3%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18741182 TALENT PLATFORM EXCHANGE AND RECRUITER MATCHING SYSTEM WEBB III, JAMES L 3d overdue
19324017 CANDIDATE ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR RECRUITING SYSTEMS LAKHANI, ANDREW C —
18734542 TALENT PLATFORM EXCHANGE AND RATING SYSTEM WEBB III, JAMES L —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18741182 TALENT PLATFORM EXCHANGE AND RECRUITER MATCHING SYSTEM WEBB III, JAMES L 3d overdue
19324017 CANDIDATE ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR RECRUITING SYSTEMS LAKHANI, ANDREW C —
18916372 SYSTEM AND INTERFACES FOR MANAGING TEMPORARY WORKERS OBAID, FATEH M —
18734542 TALENT PLATFORM EXCHANGE AND RATING SYSTEM WEBB III, JAMES L —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3624 2
3629 1
3627 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19324017 CANDIDATE ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR RECRUITING SYSTEMS LAKHANI, ANDREW C 3629 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 09, 2025
18916372 SYSTEM AND INTERFACES FOR MANAGING TEMPORARY WORKERS OBAID, FATEH M 3627 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 15, 2024
18741182 TALENT PLATFORM EXCHANGE AND RECRUITER MATCHING SYSTEM WEBB III, JAMES L 3624 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA 3d overdue Pending Jun 12, 2024
18734542 TALENT PLATFORM EXCHANGE AND RATING SYSTEM WEBB III, JAMES L 3624 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 05, 2024

Managing Scout Exchange LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Scout Exchange LLC have?

Scout Exchange LLC has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Scout Exchange LLC applications?

James L Webb III has the most, with 2 of Scout Exchange LLC's pending office actions.

What technology area are Scout Exchange LLC's patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month