Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Screen Skinz Inc.

Technology area: Communications

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Screen Skinz Inc. currently has 1 pending office action in the Communications technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, JAIN, ANKUR, and is being handled within 1 distinct art unit. The company's current prosecution activity is focused on this single matter, representing its only active interaction with the USPTO.

JAIN, ANKUR is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, holding 1 pending office action. As the sole examiner with an active case for the company, he is the primary official responsible for the current prosecution of their pending intellectual property. The use of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the technology is being evaluated within a specific framework related to communications.

With 1 pending office action to address, Screen Skinz Inc. can concentrate its resources on the specific requirements of JAIN, ANKUR. The simplicity of having 1 examiner and 1 art unit reduces the administrative complexity of the patent process. Practitioners should focus on the specific technical standards of the Communications sector to move this application forward within its assigned art unit.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
100% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
JAIN, ANKUR 1 74.9% +5.9%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18653531 SCREEN PROTECTOR WITH ENGRAVED IMAGE JAIN, ANKUR —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2649 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18653531 SCREEN PROTECTOR WITH ENGRAVED IMAGE JAIN, ANKUR 2649 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 02, 2024

Managing Screen Skinz Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month