Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (25%) |
| §102 only | 1 (25%) |
| No statute on record | 2 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZARA, JANE J | 1 | 70.8% | +15.9% |
| VIJAYARAGHAVAN, JAGAMYA NMN | 1 | 67.7% | +39.0% |
| BATES, KEENAN ALEXANDER | 1 | 46.3% | +70.8% |
| RYAN, DOUGLAS CHARLES | 1 | 40.0% | +48.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18255182 | COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE TARGETING OF PTBP1 | VIJAYARAGHAVAN, JAGAMYA NMN | 88d overdue |
| 18039858 | ENGINEERED CLASS 2 TYPE V CRISPR SYSTEMS | ZARA, JANE J | 51d overdue |
| 17641426 | COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE TARGETING OF SOD1 | RYAN, DOUGLAS CHARLES | 31d overdue |
| 18168426 | COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE TARGETING OF SOD1 | BATES, KEENAN ALEXANDER | 4d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1637 | 1 |
| 1633 | 1 |
| 1631 | 1 |
| 1635 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18039858 | ENGINEERED CLASS 2 TYPE V CRISPR SYSTEMS | ZARA, JANE J | 1637 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 51d overdue | Pending | Jun 01, 2023 |
| 18255182 | COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE TARGETING OF PTBP1 | VIJAYARAGHAVAN, JAGAMYA NMN | 1633 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 88d overdue | Pending | May 31, 2023 |
| 18168426 | COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE TARGETING OF SOD1 | BATES, KEENAN ALEXANDER | 1631 | Other | Non-Final OA | 4d overdue | Pending | Feb 13, 2023 |
| 17641426 | COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE TARGETING OF SOD1 | RYAN, DOUGLAS CHARLES | 1635 | Other | Non-Final OA | 31d overdue | Pending | Mar 08, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial