Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
SE Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action in Chemistry & Materials. The matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, creating one examination channel.
BAIRD, CAMERON MICHAEL is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. Counsel can concentrate on the single record and the examiner’s treatment of the chemistry and materials subject matter. The next response should connect each claim position to the disclosure and address the office-action issues without narrowing beyond what the prosecution strategy requires.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MARTIN, MATTHEW T | 1 | 44.7% | +38.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18589383 | CELL SUPPLY DEVICE FOR SECONDARY BATTERY | MARTIN, MATTHEW T | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18589383 | CELL SUPPLY DEVICE FOR SECONDARY BATTERY | MARTIN, MATTHEW T | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1728 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18589383 | CELL SUPPLY DEVICE FOR SECONDARY BATTERY | MARTIN, MATTHEW T | 1728 | §102§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 27, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialSE Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Matthew T Martin has the most, with 1 of SE Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
