Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Seacoast Banking Corporation Of Florida maintains a patent portfolio in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company currently has 1 pending office action. This prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. These figures show that the company's current patent activity is concentrated in 1 area of the patent office. The portfolio does not show signs of widespread filing across different technical sectors or multiple examiners. This focus allows for a more direct management of the company's intellectual property assets in e-commerce systems.
The busiest examiner for the company is ROTARU, OCTAVIAN, who is assigned 1 pending office action. This examiner is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending case, matching the total count of pending actions for the portfolio. This indicates that ROTARU, OCTAVIAN is the only examiner currently interacting with the company's patent applications. The presence of 1 distinct art unit confirms that the prosecution is occurring within 1 administrative group. This concentration allows for a consistent approach to responding to office actions. However, it also means that the company's immediate patent goals are subject to the specific review style of 1 examiner. The singular nature of the 1 distinct examiner simplifies the tracking of examiner-specific trends and preferences.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROTARU, OCTAVIAN | 1 | 27.6% | +37.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18477313 | PREDICTIVE DATA ANALYSIS USING VALUE-BASED PREDICTIVE INPUTS | ROTARU, OCTAVIAN | 70d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18477313 | PREDICTIVE DATA ANALYSIS USING VALUE-BASED PREDICTIVE INPUTS | ROTARU, OCTAVIAN | 70d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3624 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18477313 | PREDICTIVE DATA ANALYSIS USING VALUE-BASED PREDICTIVE INPUTS | ROTARU, OCTAVIAN | 3624 | §101§112Other | Non-Final OA | 70d overdue | Pending | Sep 28, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial