Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Seagen Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

12 pending office actions • 8 art units • 11 examiners • 0 of 12 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Seagen Inc. currently has 12 pending office actions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The prosecution of these matters involves 11 distinct examiners and is spread across 8 distinct art units. This high ratio of examiners and art units relative to the total number of pending actions suggests a diverse array of biological or pharmaceutical technologies being pursued. The busiest examiner for this portfolio is PUTTLITZ, KARL J, who is currently managing 2 pending office actions.

Because no single examiner holds more than 2 of the 12 total actions, the portfolio's success is highly dependent on the individual tendencies of 11 different examiners. Navigating 8 distinct art units requires a versatile approach to prosecution, as each unit may have different internal guidelines or interpretations of patentability within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals field. Practitioners must manage a complex array of deadlines and examiner interactions, with only minimal overlap in examiner assignments. This broad distribution across 11 examiners and 8 art units indicates that the 12 pending office actions cover a wide spectrum of the company's research and development efforts. The strategy for Seagen Inc. must therefore be highly individualized for each case while maintaining overall consistency in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

12
Total Pending OAs
10
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (25%)
7
Medium (58%)
2
Easy (17%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (17%)
§102 only1 (8%)
Double-patenting only2 (17%)
Double-patenting + other4 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

12
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

120 h
Manual time on pending OAs
24 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
42 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PUTTLITZ, KARL J 2 69.2% +18.5%
PETRASH, HILARY ANN 1 65.6% +50.2%
ALLEN, MARIANNE P 1 60.1% +18.4%
SHAMEEM, GOLAM M 1 86.7% +15.9%
BENAVIDES, JENNIFER ANN 1 50.8% +47.3%
HAM, JIEUN 1 45.5% +0.0%
LU, CHENG 1 53.8% +64.6%
DUFFY, PATRICIA ANN 1 52.9% +33.9%
STONEBRAKER, ALYSSA RAE 1 58.9% +49.4%
XIAO, YAN 1 67.3% +52.7%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18467633 SELECTIVE DRUG RELEASE FROM INTERNALIZED CONJUGATES OF BIOLOGICALLY ACTIVE COMPOUNDS SHAMEEM, GOLAM M —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18039473 MODULATING THE IMMUNE RESPONSE USING ANTI-CD30 ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATES LU, CHENG 46d
18448863 CYTOTOXIC COMPOUNDS AND CONJUGATES THEREOF HAM, JIEUN —
18182203 ANTIBODY DRUG CONJUGATES (ADC) THAT BIND TO 158P1D7 PROTEINS DUFFY, PATRICIA ANN —

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17926206 METHODS OF TREATING HER2 POSITIVE CANCER WITH TUCATINIB IN COMBINATION WITH TRASTUZUMAB AND AN OXALIPLATIN-BASED CHEMOTHERAPY XIAO, YAN 43d overdue
18039473 MODULATING THE IMMUNE RESPONSE USING ANTI-CD30 ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATES LU, CHENG 46d
18682886 METHODS FOR TREATING NON-MUSCLE INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER (NMIBC) WITH ANTIBODY DRUG CONJUGATES (ADC) THAT BIND TO 191P4D12 PROTEINS PETRASH, HILARY ANN —
18018504 ANTI-CD228 ANTIBODIES AND ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATES ALLEN, MARIANNE P —
18467633 SELECTIVE DRUG RELEASE FROM INTERNALIZED CONJUGATES OF BIOLOGICALLY ACTIVE COMPOUNDS SHAMEEM, GOLAM M —
18449591 METHODS OF REDUCING SIDE EFFECTS OF ANTI-CD30 ANTIBODY DRUG CONJUGATE THERAPY BENAVIDES, JENNIFER ANN —
18222313 IMMUNOMODULATORY ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATES PUTTLITZ, KARL J —
18182203 ANTIBODY DRUG CONJUGATES (ADC) THAT BIND TO 158P1D7 PROTEINS DUFFY, PATRICIA ANN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1646 3
1642 3
1644 1
1647 1
1674 1
1675 1
1643 1
1645 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18682886 METHODS FOR TREATING NON-MUSCLE INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER (NMIBC) WITH ANTIBODY DRUG CONJUGATES (ADC) THAT BIND TO 191P4D12 PROTEINS PETRASH, HILARY ANN 1644 §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 09, 2024
18018504 ANTI-CD228 ANTIBODIES AND ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATES ALLEN, MARIANNE P 1647 §102§103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 15, 2023
18467633 SELECTIVE DRUG RELEASE FROM INTERNALIZED CONJUGATES OF BIOLOGICALLY ACTIVE COMPOUNDS SHAMEEM, GOLAM M 1674 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 14, 2023
18449591 METHODS OF REDUCING SIDE EFFECTS OF ANTI-CD30 ANTIBODY DRUG CONJUGATE THERAPY BENAVIDES, JENNIFER ANN 1675 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 14, 2023
18448863 CYTOTOXIC COMPOUNDS AND CONJUGATES THEREOF HAM, JIEUN 1643 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 11, 2023
18222313 IMMUNOMODULATORY ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATES PUTTLITZ, KARL J 1646 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 14, 2023
18039473 MODULATING THE IMMUNE RESPONSE USING ANTI-CD30 ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATES LU, CHENG 1642 §103§112Other Non-Final OA 46d Pending May 30, 2023
18182203 ANTIBODY DRUG CONJUGATES (ADC) THAT BIND TO 158P1D7 PROTEINS DUFFY, PATRICIA ANN 1645 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 10, 2023
18025349 METHODS FOR TREATING CANCERS WITH ANTIBODY DRUG CONJUGATES (ADC) THAT BIND TO 191P4D12 PROTEINS STONEBRAKER, ALYSSA RAE 1642 §102§103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 08, 2023
17926206 METHODS OF TREATING HER2 POSITIVE CANCER WITH TUCATINIB IN COMBINATION WITH TRASTUZUMAB AND AN OXALIPLATIN-BASED CHEMOTHERAPY XIAO, YAN 1642 §103 Final Rejection 43d overdue Pending Nov 18, 2022
17762867 Combination Anti-CD30 ADC, Anti-PD-1 and Chemotherapeutic for Treatment of Hematopoietic Cancers ALSOMAIRY, SARAH ABDOALATIF 1646 DP Final Rejection 72d overdue Pending Mar 23, 2022
17634026 TREATMENT OF CANCERS WITH ANTIBODY DRUG CONJUGATES (ADC) THAT BIND TO 191P4D12 PROTEINS PUTTLITZ, KARL J 1646 §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 09, 2022

Managing Seagen Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Seagen Inc. have?

Seagen Inc. has 12 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 8 art units and 11 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Seagen Inc. applications?

Karl J Puttlitz has the most, with 2 of Seagen Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Seagen Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month