Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Seajet Propulsion Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This prosecution is being conducted through 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a concentrated technical focus for the company's current patenting efforts. The workload is assigned to a distinct examiner, which limits the variety of examiner perspectives currently influencing the portfolio's progression. This concentration means that the immediate patent strategy is subject to the specific interpretations of a single administrative unit.
VENNE, DANIEL V is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 pending office action currently assigned. This single action constitutes the total reported for the portfolio. For practitioners, this means that the current success of the company's filings in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector relies on the specific feedback and requirements of this one examiner within the assigned art unit. The lack of multiple examiners or art units simplifies the tracking of prosecution trends for this portfolio at this time.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| VENNE, DANIEL V | 1 | 71.2% | +15.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18529685 | BOW AND STERN THRUSTERS FOR WATERCRAFT | VENNE, DANIEL V | 15d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3615 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18529685 | BOW AND STERN THRUSTERS FOR WATERCRAFT | VENNE, DANIEL V | 3615 | §102 | Final Rejection | 15d overdue | Pending | Dec 05, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial