Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Sealance Corp. currently has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This active matter is handled by MALHOTRA, SANJEEV, who is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. The data shows 1 distinct examiner and a single distinct art unit involved in current prosecution.
This suggests a narrow channel of prosecution for the company's current intellectual property. With only a single pending office action, the company's immediate success in this technology area relies entirely on the interaction with MALHOTRA, SANJEEV. The concentration in one art unit indicates that the company is targeting a specific mechanical or e-commerce niche.
Practitioners should analyze the examiner's past behavior to optimize the response for the pending matter. The outcome of this individual case will define the company's near-term patent position in the transportation sector. As the company grows, it may benefit from diversifying its filings across multiple examiners to reduce the sensitivity of its strategy to any single official's requirements.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MALHOTRA, SANJEEV | 1 | 65.7% | +30.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18273449 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COMPLIANCE-ENABLED DIGITALLY REPRESENTED ASSETS | MALHOTRA, SANJEEV | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18273449 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COMPLIANCE-ENABLED DIGITALLY REPRESENTED ASSETS | MALHOTRA, SANJEEV | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3691 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18273449 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COMPLIANCE-ENABLED DIGITALLY REPRESENTED ASSETS | MALHOTRA, SANJEEV | 3691 | §101 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jul 20, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial