Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Sealy Technology LLC

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 12 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

The company patent portfolio for Sealy Technology LLC currently has 4 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are assigned to 4 distinct examiners across 3 distinct art units. The busiest examiner, CONLEY, FREDRICK C, is managing 1 busiest examiner pending action, which is consistent with the distribution across the rest of the portfolio.

For a practitioner, the fact that 4 pending office actions are spread across 4 distinct examiners indicates a lack of examiner concentration. However, the involvement of only 3 distinct art units suggests that at least two examiners are working within the same specialized group. This may provide some level of consistency in technical standards across the 4 pending office actions, even though the individual examiner relationships remain diverse within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector.

The workload is evenly distributed, as evidenced by CONLEY, FREDRICK C having only 1 busiest examiner pending action. This suggests that no single examiner has a dominant influence over the portfolio's current trajectory. Practitioners must carefully monitor the 3 distinct art units involved, as each may have its own specific trends and requirements that could affect the outcome of the individual cases in this technology area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CONLEY, FREDRICK C 1 70.6% +12.8%
SAHNI, VISHAL R 1 75.4% +18.9%
MCCLURE, MORGAN J 1 47.0% +32.3%
SUN, GEORGE 1 69.2% +34.1%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18421646 SUPPORT CUSHIONS INCLUDING ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE FABRIC SUN, GEORGE 41d
18904776 COIL-IN-COIL SPRINGS AND SPRING CORES INCLUDING SAME SAHNI, VISHAL R —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18899526 POCKET COIL SPRING ASSEMBLY INCLUDING FLEXIBLE FOAM MCCLURE, MORGAN J 36d overdue
18421646 SUPPORT CUSHIONS INCLUDING ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE FABRIC SUN, GEORGE 41d
19200124 MOLDED HYBRID PILLOW CONLEY, FREDRICK C —
18904776 COIL-IN-COIL SPRINGS AND SPRING CORES INCLUDING SAME SAHNI, VISHAL R —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3673 2
3679 1
3616 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19200124 MOLDED HYBRID PILLOW CONLEY, FREDRICK C 3679 §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 06, 2025
18904776 COIL-IN-COIL SPRINGS AND SPRING CORES INCLUDING SAME SAHNI, VISHAL R 3616 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 02, 2024
18899526 POCKET COIL SPRING ASSEMBLY INCLUDING FLEXIBLE FOAM MCCLURE, MORGAN J 3673 §103 Final Rejection 36d overdue Pending Sep 27, 2024
18421646 SUPPORT CUSHIONS INCLUDING ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE FABRIC SUN, GEORGE 3673 §102§103 Final Rejection 41d Pending Jan 24, 2024

Managing Sealy Technology LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Sealy Technology LLC have?

Sealy Technology LLC has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Sealy Technology LLC applications?

Fredrick C Conley has the most, with 1 of Sealy Technology LLC's pending office actions.

What technology area are Sealy Technology LLC's patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month