Technology area: Computing & Software
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days
Seekr Technologies Inc. has 2 pending office actions in the Computing & Software technology area. Both of these actions are handled by 1 distinct examiner and are located within 1 distinct art unit, representing a fully centralized prosecution for the current pending matters. This concentration means that the company's entire active portfolio is subject to the review of a single individual and a single technical group within the Computing & Software sector.
The busiest examiner, MOSER, BRUCE M, is responsible for 2 pending office actions. This examiner manages all of the company's current pending actions within the 1 distinct art unit, making their individual examination style the primary factor for this portfolio. For a practitioner, the fact that 2 pending office actions are under the same examiner and art unit allows for a highly consistent prosecution strategy. The reliance on 1 distinct examiner for the 2 pending office actions simplifies the administrative burden but increases the impact of that examiner's decisions. Any feedback received on one matter is likely to be highly relevant to the other, given they share the same examiner and art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (50%) |
| §101 + other | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MOSER, BRUCE M | 2 | 84.2% | +20.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19004795 | QUALITY SCORING SYSTEM AND METHOD HAVING SAAS ARCHITECTURE AND SOURCE AND INDUSTRY SCORE FACTORS | MOSER, BRUCE M | 112d overdue |
| 19004911 | QUALITY SCORING SYSTEM AND METHOD HAVING SOURCE AND INDUSTRY SCORE FACTORS | MOSER, BRUCE M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19004795 | QUALITY SCORING SYSTEM AND METHOD HAVING SAAS ARCHITECTURE AND SOURCE AND INDUSTRY SCORE FACTORS | MOSER, BRUCE M | 112d overdue |
| 19004911 | QUALITY SCORING SYSTEM AND METHOD HAVING SOURCE AND INDUSTRY SCORE FACTORS | MOSER, BRUCE M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2154 | 2 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19004795 | QUALITY SCORING SYSTEM AND METHOD HAVING SAAS ARCHITECTURE AND SOURCE AND INDUSTRY SCORE FACTORS | MOSER, BRUCE M | 2154 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | 112d overdue | Pending | Dec 30, 2024 |
| 19004911 | QUALITY SCORING SYSTEM AND METHOD HAVING SOURCE AND INDUSTRY SCORE FACTORS | MOSER, BRUCE M | 2154 | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 30, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialSeekr Technologies Inc. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Bruce M Moser has the most, with 2 of Seekr Technologies Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
