Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Seglan S L currently has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is being handled by a distinct examiner in a distinct art unit. IDIAKE, VINCENT I is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 pending office action. This represents a primary point of contact for the company's current prosecution activity. The concentration of the portfolio into a distinct art unit suggests a specific technical focus for this pending application.
Because there is only the 1 pending office action, the company's current prosecution profile is centralized. Practitioners can focus their efforts on the specific requirements of IDIAKE, VINCENT I and the guidelines of the distinct art unit involved. This approach allows for a dedicated strategy tailored to the examiner's perspective. The current data shows that Seglan S L is operating with a focused footprint in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| IDIAKE, VINCENT I | 1 | 71.5% | +18.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19469458 | Method for Secure Updating of Payment Means Tokens | IDIAKE, VINCENT I | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19469458 | Method for Secure Updating of Payment Means Tokens | IDIAKE, VINCENT I | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3698 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19469458 | Method for Secure Updating of Payment Means Tokens | IDIAKE, VINCENT I | 3698 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 26, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial