Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Selta Square Co. Ltd. has 2 pending office actions within its patent portfolio. These matters are categorized under the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area, showing the company's primary field of innovation. Both actions are currently being processed within 1 distinct art unit at the patent office.
The prosecution work is distributed across 2 distinct examiners. VIJAY B CHAWAN is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 pending office action. Given that there are 2 total pending actions and 2 examiners, the workload is evenly split, with each examiner managing a single pending matter. This distribution means that while the cases are in the same art unit, they are subject to the review of 2 different individuals. Practitioners should monitor both examiners to ensure a consistent approach to the company's transportation-related technology.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (50%) |
| §101 + other | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHAWAN, VIJAY B | 1 | 87.9% | +11.8% |
| ROBINSON, KYLE G | 1 | 11.7% | +16.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18361929 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SHARING DATA IN INTELLIGENT PHARMACOVIGILANCE PLATFORM | ROBINSON, KYLE G | 14d |
| 18976338 | HALLUCINATION SCORING METHOD AND APPARATUS IN HALLUCINATION SCORING SYSTEM | CHAWAN, VIJAY B | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18361929 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SHARING DATA IN INTELLIGENT PHARMACOVIGILANCE PLATFORM | ROBINSON, KYLE G | 14d |
| 18976338 | HALLUCINATION SCORING METHOD AND APPARATUS IN HALLUCINATION SCORING SYSTEM | CHAWAN, VIJAY B | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3685 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18976338 | HALLUCINATION SCORING METHOD AND APPARATUS IN HALLUCINATION SCORING SYSTEM | CHAWAN, VIJAY B | — | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 11, 2024 |
| 18361929 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SHARING DATA IN INTELLIGENT PHARMACOVIGILANCE PLATFORM | ROBINSON, KYLE G | 3685 | §101 | Final Rejection | 14d | Pending | Jul 31, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial