Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Seoyon E-Hwa Co. Ltd.

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 15 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Seoyon E-Hwa Co. Ltd. currently has 4 pending office actions, 4 distinct examiners, and 4 distinct art units in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. This distribution means that no two pending cases are being reviewed by the same person. Such an arrangement requires the applicant to adapt to 4 different examination styles simultaneously within the semiconductor sector. Consistency across the portfolio must be managed manually since no examiner oversees multiple applications.

The active cases are spread across 4 distinct art units, indicating a high level of technical variety as each case is in a different classification group. The busiest examiner is LIN, JASON, who is handling 1 pending action. This figure of 1 pending action for the busiest examiner shows that the workload is evenly spread, with each of the 4 distinct examiners managing exactly one case. Coordinating across 4 distinct art units and 4 distinct examiners necessitates a prosecution strategy that addresses the specific feedback of multiple patent office officials. The applicant should monitor the 4 distinct art units for any diverging trends in examination.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (25%)
§103 only1 (25%)
§102 only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
25% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
50% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
25% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LIN, JASON 1 72.9% +23.5%
BOOHER, ADAM W 1 75.5% +9.1%
QURESHI, MARIAM 1 75.5% +22.5%
SANTIAGO, ANAYANSI ISABEL 1 83.3% +25.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18488055 CONSOLE DEVICE FOR VEHICLE SANTIAGO, ANAYANSI ISABEL —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18931112 BSR PRE-VALIDATION SYSTEM AND METHOD WITH DOOR TRIM CONTACT POINT ANALYSIS LIN, JASON —
18932573 COVER WINDOW AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR THE SAME BOOHER, ADAM W —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18931112 BSR PRE-VALIDATION SYSTEM AND METHOD WITH DOOR TRIM CONTACT POINT ANALYSIS LIN, JASON —
18932547 COVER WINDOW AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR THE SAME QURESHI, MARIAM —
18488055 CONSOLE DEVICE FOR VEHICLE SANTIAGO, ANAYANSI ISABEL —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2117 1
2872 1
2871 1
3612 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18931112 BSR PRE-VALIDATION SYSTEM AND METHOD WITH DOOR TRIM CONTACT POINT ANALYSIS LIN, JASON 2117 §101§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 30, 2024
18932573 COVER WINDOW AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR THE SAME BOOHER, ADAM W 2872 §102§103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 30, 2024
18932547 COVER WINDOW AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR THE SAME QURESHI, MARIAM 2871 §102Other Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 30, 2024
18488055 CONSOLE DEVICE FOR VEHICLE SANTIAGO, ANAYANSI ISABEL 3612 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 17, 2023

Managing Seoyon E-Hwa Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Seoyon E-Hwa Co. Ltd. have?

Seoyon E-Hwa Co. Ltd. has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 4 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Seoyon E-Hwa Co. Ltd. applications?

Jason Lin has the most, with 1 of Seoyon E-Hwa Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Seoyon E-Hwa Co. Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics (USPTO Tech Center 2800), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month