Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Shanghai Intervascular Medtech Co. Ltd.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Shanghai Intervascular Medtech Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is distributed across 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The focus on the identified art unit and examiner indicates a specific technical examination path for the company. By operating within 1 art unit, the company maintains a narrow procedural footprint. This structure allows the legal team to focus their resources on the requirements of a specific technical group within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering field.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is PELLEGRINO, BRIAN E, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since the total number of pending office actions is 1, this examiner manages the current workload. This concentration means the company's immediate prosecution outcomes depend on the findings of PELLEGRINO, BRIAN E. For the practitioner, understanding the specific preferences of this individual is the primary factor in the current prosecution strategy. The outcome of the 1 pending office action will be determined by the review of this identified examiner.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PELLEGRINO, BRIAN E 1 55.2% +35.6%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18565937 CONVEYING DEVICE AND MEDICAL DEVICE PELLEGRINO, BRIAN E —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18565937 CONVEYING DEVICE AND MEDICAL DEVICE PELLEGRINO, BRIAN E —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3799 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18565937 CONVEYING DEVICE AND MEDICAL DEVICE PELLEGRINO, BRIAN E 3799 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 30, 2023

Managing Shanghai Intervascular Medtech Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month