Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Shanghai Mag-Gene Nano Tech Co. Ltd. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, indicating a highly focused prosecution effort. TURK, NEIL N is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, overseeing 1 pending office action. The outcome of the company's current patent filing is therefore entirely dependent on the examination practices and decisions of this specific individual.
The involvement of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the technology is categorized within a specialized administrative group of Chemistry & Materials. For the practitioner, this means that prosecution strategy must be tailored to the specific norms and prior art search patterns of that unit. Since TURK, NEIL N is the only examiner currently handling a pending matter for Shanghai Mag-Gene Nano Tech Co. Ltd., their historical data regarding allowance rates and interview receptivity will be the most important factor in the prosecution process.
With 1 pending office action, there is no opportunity to compare different examiner responses or art unit efficiencies within the current portfolio. The practitioner should focus on building a clear record with the assigned examiner to resolve the 1 pending office action. Because the portfolio is concentrated in a single art unit, understanding the specific preferences of that group is essential for advancing the patent objectives of Shanghai Mag-Gene Nano Tech Co. Ltd.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TURK, NEIL N | 1 | 51.0% | +44.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17802514 | DETECTION PARTICLE SUITABLE FOR MULTIPLEX DETECTION OF BIOMOLECULE, PREPARATION METHOD AND APPLICATION THEREOF | TURK, NEIL N | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17802514 | DETECTION PARTICLE SUITABLE FOR MULTIPLEX DETECTION OF BIOMOLECULE, PREPARATION METHOD AND APPLICATION THEREOF | TURK, NEIL N | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1798 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17802514 | DETECTION PARTICLE SUITABLE FOR MULTIPLEX DETECTION OF BIOMOLECULE, PREPARATION METHOD AND APPLICATION THEREOF | TURK, NEIL N | 1798 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 13, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial