Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Shanghai Wallaby Medical Technologies Co. Inc.

4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
4
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (75%)
§102 only1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DAVID, SHAUN L 1 73.0% +19.3%
MCGINNITY, JAMES RYAN 1 57.3% +51.7%
TURKOWSKI, KAYLA MARIE 1 65.1% +49.7%
LOUIS, RICHARD G 1 74.5% +17.3%

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18928016 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR TREATING BLOCKED BLOOD VESSELS DAVID, SHAUN L 7d
17161368 IMPLANT DELIVERY SYSTEMS AND METHODS LOUIS, RICHARD G 15d
18749586 IMPLANT DELIVERY SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE MCGINNITY, JAMES RYAN 21d
17634523 Multi-layer Catheter Construction TURKOWSKI, KAYLA MARIE 61d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3771 3
3783 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18928016 DEVICES AND METHODS FOR TREATING BLOCKED BLOOD VESSELS DAVID, SHAUN L 3771 §102 Non-Final OA 7d Pending Oct 26, 2024
18749586 IMPLANT DELIVERY SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE MCGINNITY, JAMES RYAN 3771 §103 Non-Final OA 21d Pending Jun 20, 2024
17634523 Multi-layer Catheter Construction TURKOWSKI, KAYLA MARIE 3783 §103 Final Rejection 61d Pending Feb 10, 2022
17161368 IMPLANT DELIVERY SYSTEMS AND METHODS LOUIS, RICHARD G 3771 §103 Final Rejection 15d Pending Jan 28, 2021

Managing Shanghai Wallaby Medical Technologies Co. Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month