Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Shedrain Corporation has 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. Both of these actions are located within 1 distinct art unit, suggesting that the company's current filings are being reviewed by the same specialized technical group. This concentration in 1 distinct art unit can lead to more consistent examination results for the 2 pending office actions. It also allows the company to focus its technical arguments on the standards of a single group.
The company's prosecution involves 2 distinct examiners, indicating that different individuals within the same art unit are evaluating the applications. JACKSON, DANIELLE is the busiest examiner, managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. This represents a portion of the total 2 pending office actions currently active for the organization. With 2 distinct examiners involved, the company must address two different individual perspectives while operating within the same technical framework of the art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| JACKSON, DANIELLE | 1 | 65.3% | +26.6% |
| HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER | 1 | 61.4% | +22.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18968719 | UMBRELLA WITH ANTI-INVERSION ASSEMBLY | JACKSON, DANIELLE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18649363 | UMBRELLA HAVING ANTI-INVERSION MECHANISM | HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER | 9d overdue |
| 18968719 | UMBRELLA WITH ANTI-INVERSION ASSEMBLY | JACKSON, DANIELLE | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3636 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18968719 | UMBRELLA WITH ANTI-INVERSION ASSEMBLY | JACKSON, DANIELLE | — | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 04, 2024 |
| 18649363 | UMBRELLA HAVING ANTI-INVERSION MECHANISM | HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER | 3636 | §103 | Final Rejection | 9d overdue | Pending | Apr 29, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial