Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute Of Bioorganic Chemistry Of The Russian Academy Of Sciences holds a company patent portfolio within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. There is currently 1 pending office action associated with this portfolio, which indicates a focused and singular point of active prosecution. This level of activity suggests that the institute is currently prioritizing a specific technological advancement or a single patent application.
The examination of this portfolio is handled by 1 distinct examiner. This examiner works within 1 distinct art unit, which suggests that the institute's Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals innovations are currently being reviewed within a specific technical specialty. CROW, ROBERT THOMAS is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. This examiner is currently overseeing the 1 pending office action on record.
With a busiest examiner pending count of 1, the institute's entire active prosecution is concentrated under a single individual. This concentration allows for a highly specific prosecution strategy tailored to the feedback of 1 distinct examiner. The institute's progress in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals field is currently tied to the resolution of this 1 pending matter.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CROW, ROBERT THOMAS | 1 | 41.7% | +32.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18161723 | METHOD FOR ULTRAHIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING OF BIOLOGICAL OBJECTS | CROW, ROBERT THOMAS | 27d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18161723 | METHOD FOR ULTRAHIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING OF BIOLOGICAL OBJECTS | CROW, ROBERT THOMAS | 27d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1683 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18161723 | METHOD FOR ULTRAHIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING OF BIOLOGICAL OBJECTS | CROW, ROBERT THOMAS | 1683 | §103§112Other | Non-Final OA | 27d | Pending | Jan 30, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial