Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Shenzhen Anycubic Technology Co. Ltd.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Shenzhen Anycubic Technology Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This case is assigned to examiner AHMED ALI, MOHAMED K, who is the busiest examiner for the portfolio with 1 pending matter. The prosecution involves only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a highly focused technological area for the company's current patent activity.

Success depends on addressing the specific technical points raised by this official. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner involved, the company's immediate patent outcomes depend entirely on the individual discretion of AHMED ALI, MOHAMED K. This lack of examiner diversity means the prosecution strategy must be precisely tailored to the specific requirements of the assigned art unit. The presence of only 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's research and development in this area is highly specialized. Practitioners should focus on addressing the technical nuances identified by the examiner to advance the application.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
AHMED ALI, MOHAMED K 1 71.0% +26.9%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18616261 CANTILEVER ASSEMBLY AND RAPID PROTOTYPING DEVICE AHMED ALI, MOHAMED K —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18616261 CANTILEVER ASSEMBLY AND RAPID PROTOTYPING DEVICE AHMED ALI, MOHAMED K —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1743 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18616261 CANTILEVER ASSEMBLY AND RAPID PROTOTYPING DEVICE AHMED ALI, MOHAMED K 1743 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 26, 2024

Managing Shenzhen Anycubic Technology Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month