Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Shenzhen Capchem Technology Co. Ltd.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

6 pending office actions • 6 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 9 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Shenzhen Capchem Technology Co. Ltd. has 6 pending office actions in Chemistry & Materials. The portfolio is distributed across 6 distinct examiners and 6 distinct art units, so every pending matter has a separate examiner and art unit assignment. This structure calls for matter-specific prosecution management rather than a single portfolio-wide response approach.

MALONEY, MICHAEL PATRICK is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. That assignment is only one part of the pending record, and the data does not identify a dominant examiner concentration. Counsel should maintain separate issue tracking for each art unit while looking for recurring claim or disclosure themes across the matters.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
2
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (83%)
1
Medium (17%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (83%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

6
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MALONEY, MICHAEL PATRICK 1 — —
OTERO, KENNETH MAX 1 52.4% +43.3%
CARVALHO JR., ARMINDO 1 50.2% +27.6%
PIRO, NICHOLAS ANTHONY 1 47.5% +41.3%
CORNO JR, JAMES ANTHONY JOHN 1 38.1% +35.2%
COUGHLIN, MATTHEW P 1 71.3% +12.5%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18741803 LITHIUM BATTERY SEPARATOR AND LITHIUM BATTERY MALONEY, MICHAEL PATRICK —
18251299 POSITIVE ELECTRODE SHEET AND LITHIUM-ION BATTERY CARVALHO JR., ARMINDO —
18296721 METHOD FOR CATALYZING REACTION OF EPOXIDE COMPOUND AND CARBON DIOXIDE WITH CATALYST PIRO, NICHOLAS ANTHONY —
18010818 Secondary Battery CORNO JR, JAMES ANTHONY JOHN —
18080682 LINEAR CARBONATE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF COUGHLIN, MATTHEW P —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18036400 LITHIUM ION BATTERY OTERO, KENNETH MAX —
18251299 POSITIVE ELECTRODE SHEET AND LITHIUM-ION BATTERY CARVALHO JR., ARMINDO —
18296721 METHOD FOR CATALYZING REACTION OF EPOXIDE COMPOUND AND CARBON DIOXIDE WITH CATALYST PIRO, NICHOLAS ANTHONY —
18010818 Secondary Battery CORNO JR, JAMES ANTHONY JOHN —
18080682 LINEAR CARBONATE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF COUGHLIN, MATTHEW P —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1782 1
1725 1
1729 1
1738 1
1722 1
1626 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18741803 LITHIUM BATTERY SEPARATOR AND LITHIUM BATTERY MALONEY, MICHAEL PATRICK 1782 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 13, 2024
18036400 LITHIUM ION BATTERY OTERO, KENNETH MAX 1725 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 10, 2023
18251299 POSITIVE ELECTRODE SHEET AND LITHIUM-ION BATTERY CARVALHO JR., ARMINDO 1729 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending May 01, 2023
18296721 METHOD FOR CATALYZING REACTION OF EPOXIDE COMPOUND AND CARBON DIOXIDE WITH CATALYST PIRO, NICHOLAS ANTHONY 1738 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 06, 2023
18010818 Secondary Battery CORNO JR, JAMES ANTHONY JOHN 1722 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 16, 2022
18080682 LINEAR CARBONATE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF COUGHLIN, MATTHEW P 1626 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 13, 2022

Managing Shenzhen Capchem Technology Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Shenzhen Capchem Technology Co. Ltd. have?

Shenzhen Capchem Technology Co. Ltd. has 6 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 6 art units and 6 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Shenzhen Capchem Technology Co. Ltd. applications?

Michael Patrick Maloney has the most, with 1 of Shenzhen Capchem Technology Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Shenzhen Capchem Technology Co. Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month