Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Shenzhen Imoon Technology Co. Ltd. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This single action is being handled by 1 distinct examiner, which indicates a highly concentrated prosecution focus for the portfolio at this stage. The lack of diversity in examiners suggests that the company's current interactions with the USPTO are limited to a specific active application.
The prosecution is confined to 1 distinct art unit, which aligns with the specialized nature of the technology area. CASLER, BRIAN L is identified as the busiest examiner for the portfolio, responsible for the 1 pending office action. Because this examiner holds the entirety of the pending workload, the progression of the portfolio is currently dependent on the specific review pace and tendencies of this individual official.
Practitioners should note that the concentration in 1 art unit simplifies the procedural landscape, as there are no conflicting requirements from different administrative branches. The presence of only 1 distinct examiner means that the applicant can focus their strategy on a single set of examiner preferences. This streamlined environment allows for a very targeted approach to resolving the 1 pending office action currently on record.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CASLER, BRIAN L | 1 | 79.2% | +21.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18503129 | MASSAGER WITH BETTER ADSORPTION EFFECT | CASLER, BRIAN L | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3791 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18503129 | MASSAGER WITH BETTER ADSORPTION EFFECT | CASLER, BRIAN L | 3791 | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 06, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialShenzhen Imoon Technology Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Brian L Casler has the most, with 1 of Shenzhen Imoon Technology Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
